Change all names to look like IDs and mention HTTP is supported#66
Change all names to look like IDs and mention HTTP is supported#66sjmiller609 merged 2 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Performed full review of c09797f...3d85365
Analysis
-
The documentation changes standardize naming conventions but don't address whether existing implementations with the previous naming patterns will continue to work, potentially causing backward compatibility issues for users following older documentation.
-
While the PR expands protocol support to include both HTTP and HTTPS, there's no mention of security considerations or guidance for when to use one protocol over the other, which could lead to improper implementations.
-
The PR appears to be documentation-focused without corresponding code changes - this may create a disconnect if the actual implementation doesn't fully support or validate the newly documented naming conventions and protocol options.
Tip
⚡ Quick Actions
This review was generated by Mesa.
Actions:
Slash Commands:
/review- Request a full code review/review latest- Review only changes since the last review/describe- Generate PR description. This will update the PR body or issue comment depending on your configuration/help- Get help with Mesa commands and configuration options
6 files reviewed | 0 comments | Review on Mesa | Edit Reviewer Settings
TL;DR
This PR refactors resource identifiers, changing them from human-readable names to a standardized ID format across the HTTP protocol.
Why we made these changes
To improve consistency and predictability in our API. Using a uniform ID format for all resources (e.g.,
brw_...,app_...) prevents ambiguity caused by user-defined names, simplifies client-side logic, and makes the API more robust for automation.What changed?
/browsers/{name}) have been updated to use the new ID format (e.g.,/browsers/{id}).Validation
Description generated by Mesa. Update settings